2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2004 Ford F-150
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2004 Ford F-150. (203 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 217 kg more than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (343 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (262 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 2004 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS | F-150 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 203 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 262 Nm | 343 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.8 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1837 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 95 L |