2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser

To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser. (235 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser.

Because 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser. (434 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac CTS 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser
Make Cadillac Toyota
Model CTS Land Cruiser
Year Released 2006 2004
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5965 cc 4671 cc
Horse Power 400 HP 235 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3400 RPM
Torque 536 Nm 434 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 8 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1870 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2860 mm
Fuel Consumption 9.6 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 14.9 L/100km 18.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.5 L/100km 16.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 96 L