2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2005 Dodge Magnum
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Magnum. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Magnum would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2005 Dodge Magnum. (340 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2005 Dodge Magnum.
Because 2005 Dodge Magnum is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Magnum will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Dodge Magnum. (529 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Dodge Magnum.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 2005 Dodge Magnum | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | CTS | Magnum |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 5654 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 340 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 529 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.6 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 72 L |