2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (174 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | CTS | Hardbody |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |