2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2005 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Scenic would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 2005 Renault Scenic. (137 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Scenic.
Because 2005 Renault Scenic is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Scenic. (180 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 2005 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | CTS | Scenic |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |