2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2007 Nissan Micra

To start off, 2007 Nissan Micra is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 321 more horse power than 2007 Nissan Micra. (79 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan Micra.

Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 426 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan Micra. (110 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan Micra.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac CTS 2007 Nissan Micra
Make Cadillac Nissan
Model CTS Micra
Year Released 2006 2007
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5965 cc 1240 cc
Horse Power 400 HP 79 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 536 Nm 110 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 3600 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 3720 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2440 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.5 L/100km 5.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 46 L