2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2007 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2007 Nissan Titan is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2007 Nissan Titan. (317 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan Titan.
Because 2007 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan Titan. (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan Titan.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 2007 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | CTS | Titan |
Year Released | 2006 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 5552 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.6 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 18.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 15.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 106 L |