2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2008 Chrysler 300

To start off, 2008 Chrysler 300 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2008 Chrysler 300. (340 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2008 Chrysler 300.

Because 2008 Chrysler 300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler 300. (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler 300.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac CTS 2008 Chrysler 300
Make Cadillac Chrysler
Model CTS 300
Year Released 2006 2008
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5965 cc 5654 cc
Horse Power 400 HP 340 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 536 Nm 529 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 5020 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 3050 mm
Fuel Consumption 9.6 L/100km 10.2 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 14.9 L/100km 15.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.5 L/100km 12.3 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 72 L