2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2008 Mazda MPV

To start off, 2008 Mazda MPV is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 2008 Mazda MPV. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda MPV.

Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 341 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda MPV. (195 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda MPV.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac CTS 2008 Mazda MPV
Make Cadillac Mazda
Model CTS MPV
Year Released 2006 2008
Body Type Sedan Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5965 cc 2261 cc
Horse Power 400 HP 139 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 536 Nm 195 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4780 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2850 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.5 L/100km 10.3 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 75 L