2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2010 Ford Flex
To start off, 2010 Ford Flex is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2010 Ford Flex. (262 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Flex.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Flex. (336 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Flex.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 2010 Ford Flex | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS | Flex |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 3500 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5126 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2995 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.6 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |