2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2010 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2010 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 2010 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Proton |
| Model | CTS | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 263 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2610 mm |
