2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2012 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2012 Holden Caprice is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2012 Holden Caprice. (344 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Caprice.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Caprice. (530 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Caprice.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 2012 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | CTS | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 6000 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 536 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
