2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2013 Lexus RX
To start off, 2013 Lexus RX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lexus RX (291 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (211 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lexus RX weights approximately 458 kg more than 2006 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lexus RX (317 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (263 Nm). This means 2013 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 2013 Lexus RX | |
Make | Cadillac | Lexus |
Model | CTS | RX |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 291 HP |
Torque | 263 Nm | 317 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 12.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1885 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1695 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |