2006 Cadillac DTS vs. 1955 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2006 Cadillac DTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac DTS (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 1955 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Cadillac DTS has automatic transmission and 1955 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1955 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac DTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac DTS | 1955 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DTS | 12 M |
Year Released | 2006 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2500 mm |