2006 Cadillac DTS vs. 1968 Volvo 145

To start off, 2006 Cadillac DTS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac DTS (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 145. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 448 kg more than 1968 Volvo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac DTS (388 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 145. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 145.

Compare all specifications: