2006 Cadillac DTS vs. 1974 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2006 Cadillac DTS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac DTS (275 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1974 Holden Belmont. (133 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1974 Holden Belmont.
Because 1974 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac DTS (396 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Holden Belmont. (263 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac DTS | 1974 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | DTS | Belmont |
Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 3298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 396 Nm | 263 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2830 mm |