2006 Cadillac DTS vs. 1982 Lancia Beta
To start off, 2006 Cadillac DTS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac DTS (275 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1982 Lancia Beta. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Lancia Beta.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac DTS (396 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Beta. (108 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac DTS | 1982 Lancia Beta | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | DTS | Beta |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 1367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 396 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 71.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |