2006 Cadillac DTS vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2006 Cadillac DTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac DTS | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DTS | Econoline |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 5407 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2020 mm |