2006 Cadillac DTS vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2006 Cadillac DTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 4,565 cc, 2006 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Cadillac DTS has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac DTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac DTS | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Cadillac | MCC |
Model | DTS | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 599 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1630 mm |