2006 Cadillac DTS vs. 2004 Ford F-150
To start off, 2006 Cadillac DTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac DTS (275 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2004 Ford F-150. (203 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford F-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac DTS (396 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford F-150. (343 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac DTS | 2004 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | DTS | F-150 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4572 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 203 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 396 Nm | 343 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 97 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 95 L |
