2006 Cadillac DTS vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac DTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac DTS would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost weights approximately 737 kg more than 2006 Cadillac DTS.
Because 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost (780 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 392 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac DTS. (388 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac DTS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac DTS | 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost | |
Make | Cadillac | Rolls-Royce |
Model | DTS | Ghost |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 780 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 2495 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5569 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1948 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3465 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 82 L |