2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1533 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Escalade | EJ |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2680 mm |