2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1963 Lotus 25. (196 HP @ 9500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 2235 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | Escalade | 25 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 196 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 9500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2691 kg | 456 kg |