2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1472 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | Escalade | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 130 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.9 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2700 mm |