2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1174 kg more than 1964 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 377 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | Escalade | Elan |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 45 L |