2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1965 Lotus 33
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus 33 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1965 Lotus 33. (212 HP @ 10800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus 33. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 2235 kg more than 1965 Lotus 33. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lotus 33. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1965 Lotus 33 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | Escalade | 33 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 10800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2691 kg | 456 kg |