2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 2031 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | Escalade | Elan |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2691 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 45 L |