2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1968 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1227 kg more than 1968 Jaguar 240.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Jaguar 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Jaguar 240. (204 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1968 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | Escalade | 240 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 131 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.9 mm | 76.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 54 L |