2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1969 Ford 17
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford 17 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1592 kg more than 1969 Ford 17.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford 17. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Ford 17. (113 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1969 Ford 17 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Escalade | 17 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 113 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.9 mm | 72.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 87 L |