2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1980 Audi 4000
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1980 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 4000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1980 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Audi |
| Model | Escalade | 4000 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2550 mm |
