2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1980 Seat 127
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat 127 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1962 kg more than 1980 Seat 127.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Seat 127. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 452 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat 127. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1980 Seat 127 | |
Make | Cadillac | Seat |
Model | Escalade | 127 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 903 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 47 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2230 mm |