2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1591 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 360. (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 360.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Escalade | 360 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2691 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 58 L |