2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1921 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | Escalade | 102 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2691 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2160 mm |