2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1747 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | Escalade | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.9 mm | 71.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 57 L |