2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1572 kg more than 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo. (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
Model | Escalade | Bi Turbo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2510 mm |