2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1992 Rover 400
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 400 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1491 kg more than 1992 Rover 400.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 400. (180 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1992 Rover 400 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | Escalade | 400 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 86 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.9 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 22.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 1176 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2560 mm |