2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 252 kg more than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (569 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac Escalade. (515 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac Escalade.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Escalade | Econoline |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 6801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 302 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.9 mm | 106 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 2415 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3510 mm |