2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1999 MCC Smart
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 MCC Smart would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1967 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 435 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 MCC Smart. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1999 MCC Smart | |
Make | Cadillac | MCC |
Model | Escalade | Smart |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 63.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.9 mm | 63 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 3230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2280 mm |