2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1999 Mercury Tracer
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 906 kg more than 1999 Mercury Tracer.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Mercury Tracer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 345 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mercury Tracer. (170 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mercury Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1999 Mercury Tracer | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | Escalade | Tracer |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2640 kg | 1734 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2510 mm |