2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1480 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (339 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Escalade | Astro |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 64 L |