2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac Escalade. (345 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac Escalade.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford ST 460. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Escalade | ST 460 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2580 mm |