2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 2251 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac Escalade | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Westfield |
| Model | Escalade | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2691 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2320 mm |
