2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 297 kg more than 2004 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-250. (389 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Escalade | E-250 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 389 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.9 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 132 L |