2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2004 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1157 kg more than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 2004 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Escalade | B3000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 244 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.9 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 74 L |