2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2008 Saab 9-7X
To start off, 2008 Saab 9-7X is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2008 Saab 9-7X. (300 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2008 Saab 9-7X.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Saab 9-7X. (435 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Saab 9-7X.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 2008 Saab 9-7X | |
Make | Cadillac | Saab |
Model | Escalade | 9-7X |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 5328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 435 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.2 L/100km | 18.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.8 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 83 L |