2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP) has 167 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac Escalade | 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | Escalade | PT Dream Cruiser |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 2397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 178 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2000 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 14 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
