2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 313 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo C30. (350 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Escalade | C30 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 60 L |