2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 151 kg more than 2012 Fisker Karma.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac Escalade | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fisker |
| Model | Escalade | Karma |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2691 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 36 L |
