2006 Cadillac SRX vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Cadillac SRX is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,562 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac SRX (256 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 719 kg more than 1967 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac SRX | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | SRX | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3562 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1889 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 64 L |