2006 Cadillac SRX vs. 1974 Mazda 616
To start off, 2006 Cadillac SRX is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,562 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac SRX (256 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 977 kg more than 1974 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac SRX | 1974 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | SRX | 616 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3562 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 342 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1889 kg | 912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2480 mm |
